Current guardrails are a mix of industry best practices, voluntary screening and government regulation. Many synthesis companies willingly participate in sequence screening initiatives that flag orders matching known pathogens or dangerous sequences. Some generative AI companies also apply content and model-safety policies that block prompts about biological-harm instructions. But in the open letter, experts across the fields of science, technology, public policy, academia and law are proposing tougher measures. The public letter shows a consensus that the risks of AI-developed bioweapons des
AI Leaders Call for Rules on Synthetic DNA to Limit Bioweapons Risk…Selecting live chat connects you with an AI chatbot that can pull simple answers from the knowledge base. An AI that was very determined to hold my attention, consistently responding to my…
…In January, Starlink filed for a million orbital AI data centers. Spacefaring countries are technically bound by the United Nations' Outer Space Treaty of 1967, but commercial enterprises are another story. And…
…Bitdefender’s other cybersecurity tools, like its browser safety extension, are equally simple and can keep you safe from many digital threats that Defender doesn’t protect you from. Malwarebytes is the…
…This functionality is very similar to Bitdefender’s browser safety extension. The biggest difference is that Malwarebytes doesn’t let you pause Browser Guard on specific websites; you’ll need to fully…
…process that would ask AI developers to give the feds access to certain advanced models up to 30 days before releasing them to others, so that the government can assess any new…
To show you the most relevant results, we’ve omitted some entries very similar to those already shown. Repeat the search with the omitted results included.