Current guardrails are a mix of industry best practices, voluntary screening and government regulation. Many synthesis companies willingly participate in sequence screening initiatives that flag orders matching known pathogens or dangerous sequences. Some generative AI companies also apply content and model-safety policies that block prompts about biological-harm instructions. But in the open letter, experts across the fields of science, technology, public policy, academia and law are proposing tougher measures. The public letter shows a consensus that the risks of AI-developed bioweapons des
AI Leaders Call for Rules on Synthetic DNA to Limit Bioweapons RiskFlock states on its website that it stores data for 30 days on Amazon Web Services cloud storage and then deletes it. It uses KMS-based encryption (a managed encryption key system common in AWS) and reports that all images and related data are encrypted from on-device storage to cloud storage. When Flock collects criminal justice information, or sensitive data managed by law enforcement, it's only available to official government agencies, not an entity like your local HOA. Because video data is encrypted throughout its transfer to the end user, employees at Flock cannot access it. These are
When Flock Cameras Appear: Everything You Need to Know About This Surveillance Tech… Some generative AI companies also apply content and model-safety policies that block prompts about biological-harm instructions. But in the open letter, experts across the fields of science, technology, public policy, academia and law are proposing tougher measures. …
… Few issues in today's digital age spark as much fiery debate as online safety, regulation and policy for children and teens. …
… Grok is still available in the Apple and Google app stores and is still reportedly able to create abusive AI sexual images , despite the company saying otherwise.
… "Voluntary frameworks are not enough," Anthony Aguirre, CEO and president of the AI safety nonprofit Future of Life Institute , said in a statement emailed to CNET. …
… But AI surveillance doesn't begin or end with one company. Flock Safety is an intermediary that provides technology in demand by powerful organizations. …
… Is it actively lobbying against AI safety legislation that you support? Have you looked it up in the AI safety index ? How are its products used? If you work for Google or OpenAI, have you skimmed any of the lawsuits against your company for alleged chatbot-linked suicide? …
… Last year, Character.AI made sweeping policy and safety changes, barring anyone under the age of 18 from using the platform for open-ended chats. …
… OpenAI said it's focused on maintaining its iterative, prompt-based editing flow to keep it easy to use. OpenAI's safety procedures haven't significantly changed since its last image model. It still includes metadata through the C2PA standard, so AI images' origins can be identified. …
… In a change, Claude business users will now have to agree to a 30-day data retention policy. Anthropic said the data will be used to help the company defend against future cyberattacks and AI misuse, not to train new AI models. …
… We're right to worry about how AI can compromise our safety and security. Companies like OpenAI, xAI and Meta have lost public trust and had to make major policy changes to convince us that our sensitive information is being protected. …